Dawkins interview gone wrong

Notice how many times they use the word "design" and how they try to explain away many things by saying it was "designed" and then "natural selection" cleaned it up. It is so mixed with their preconceived worldview that it is borderline funny. Just using basic logic you can easily dismiss any of their arguments. For instance when they discuss the eye they say it has a blind spot and hence it is a flaw (apparently by the designer) but then natural selection cleans this up by making the eye vibrate a little...WHAT!? They eye has always done that, what they need to do is prove otherwise, it was designed to move like that by a designer!

And I am not a scientist but the blueprint is in the DNA? Or do you mean the actual first man which was the original model for all men.... his name was "Adam".